Legal Opinion

Driverless Car Co. v. Armstrong

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 19, 1932No. 13,078PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

The Driverless Car Company, and five other corporations engaged in the business of renting driverless cars, sought to restrain the secretary of state from enforcing against them subdivision (c) of section 29, subdivision (c) of section 31, and section 103, chapter 122, Session Laws of 1931. To secure a reversal of the judgment dismissing’ their suit, they prosecute this proceeding, contending that those portions of the Motor Vehicle Act are unconstitutional.

Section 27 of the act requires motor vehicles, with certain exceptions, to be registered, and forbids the operation of unregistered motor…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Watson v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Hodge Drive-It-Yourself Co. v. CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. People ex rel. Johnson v. EarlSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  4. Edwards v. Denver & R. G. R.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  5. Rifle Potato Growers Co-Operative Ass'n v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc. v. SigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Rinn v. BedfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  3. People v. RapiniSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  4. In Re InterrogatoriesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  5. Landwehr v. Regents of University of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API