Legal Opinion

Rifle Potato Growers Co-Operative Ass'n v. Smith

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 19, 1925No. 11,142PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

The plaintiff in error was plaintiff below and was defeated on trial to the court in a suit to enjoin Smith from disposing of his potatoes in violation of a marketing contract executed by plaintiff and defendant under the act of 1923, S. L. 1923, c. 142, and the case comes here on error.

Smith was a potato grower; he joined the plaintiff company and signed the standard marketing contract by which he agreed to sell his potatoes to plaintiff only. He sold to others and threatened to continue to do so, whereupon plaintiff brought this suit.

His first defense is that the contract is unilateral, and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Northern Wisconsin Co-operative Tobacco Pool v. BekkedalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  3. People ex rel. Johnson v. EarlSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  4. Phez Co. v. Salem Fruit UnionOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Tobacco Growers Cooperative Ass'n v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Liberty Warehouse Co. v. Burley Tobacco Growers' Co-Operative Marketing Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. American Water Development, Inc. v. City of AlamosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. O'QUINN v. Walt Disney Productions, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  4. McCarty v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  5. City of Montrose v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API