Legal Opinion

In Re Interrogatories

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 18, 1935No. 13,787PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hilliard

Pursuant to section 3, article VI, of the Constitution, which provides that “The Supreme Court shall give its opinion upon important questions upon solemn occasions when required by the Governor,” his Excellency, Hon. Edwin C. Johnson, has inquired whether the act approved April 4, 1935 (c. 118, Session Laws, 1935), is constitutional.

The Governor’s concern grows out of the fact that certain merchants of Colorado, advised that the act in question contravened their constitutional right to conduct restaurants, and anticipating its effective date, filed their bill of complaint in the United…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Miller v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. McLean v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Farmers & Merchants Bank of Monroe v. Federal Reserve Bank of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Liggett Drug Co. v. License CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. People ex rel. Dunbar v. Gym of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  3. Ferguson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. Cottrell Clothing Company v. TeetsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  5. Smith Brothers Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. People Ex Rel. RogersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API