Legal Opinion

Fuller v. City of Grand Rapids

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1895PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to'superior court of Grand Rapids. (Burlingame, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The*facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

December 4, 1886, plaintiff purchased from one John You ell lot 1 of Bryan & Ball’s addition to the city of Grand Rapids, situated on the corner of East Fulton and South Waterloo streets. The deed excepted the .right of way for Fulton street. She was the owner at the time of the grievance complained of. In 1884, Fulton street was opened, from Waterloo street to the Fulton street bridge,.66 feet wide. It became necessary to fill in the street between those points, so that the roadway, which was then fixed at the width of 38 feet, was about *5316 feet above the level of the lot. Mr. Youell, at his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. Mayor of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Grand Rapids & Indiana R. R. v. HeiselMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Fisher v. ThirkellMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Sheldon v. Village of KalamazooMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Vanderlip v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. 1426 Woodward Avenue Corp. v. WolffMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Bennett v. Incorporated Town of Mount VernonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. City of Kentwood v. Sommerdyke EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Weber v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Pastorino v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API