Legal Opinion

City of Kentwood v. Sommerdyke Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1998No. 109646, Calendar No. 7PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, J.

In this case we granted leave to appeal to determine whether a highway created by use under the highway-by-user statute1 is limited to the area of *646actual public use, or to the statutory four-rod width. If the latter, we then must determine whether the four-rod-wide rebuttable presumption is constitutional under the Michigan and United States Constitutions. In accordance with United States Supreme Court case law, we hold that the state has the authority to condition the retention of certain property rights on the performance of an affirmative act within a reasonable statutory period. To that…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tolksdorf v. GriffithMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Muskin v. State Department of Assessments & TaxationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  3. Romanski v. Detroit Entertainment, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
  4. Yono v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Cimock v. ConklinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API