Legal Opinion

Smith v. Foxworthy

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1894No. 5097PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the district court of Lancaster county. Heard below before Field, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

This is an appeal by the defendant Foxworthy from an order confirming a sale of h¿s real estate made under a de*215cree of foreclosure formerly entered in the cause. The grounds upon which confirmation was resisted will be treated in their order:

1. That the appraisement was too low. In Vought v. Foxworthy, 38 Neb., 790, it was held that on motion to vacate a sale the value fixed by the appraisers can only be assailed for fraud; that objections upon the ground that the appraised value is too high or too low should be filed with a motion to vacate the appraisement before the sale occurs,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vought v. FoxworthyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Craig v. StevensonNebraska Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ecklund v. WillisNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Kearney Land & Investment Co. v. AspinwallNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Hamer v. McKinley-Lanning Loan & Trust Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Mills v. HamerNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Jarrett v. HooverNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API