Legal Opinion

City of Kearney v. Smith

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1896No. 6342PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from the district court of Buffalo county. Tried below before Holcomb, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, 0.

The defendant in error recovered a judgment of $450 against the plaintiff in error, for injuries sustained by reason of a fall alleged to have been caused by a defective sidewalk. The city seeks to reverse this judgment.

The first, second, third, and fourth assignments of error relate to the giving and refusal of instructions; but as the record does not disclose that any exceptions were taken to either the giving or refusal of instructions, these assignments are not open to examination. The only other assignment is that the damages were excessive. Neither by oral argument nor by…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co. v. GerholdNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Hamer v. McFegganNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API