Legal Opinion

Prendergast v. City of Tempe

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 25, 1984No. 1 CA-CIV 6542PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs-Appellees brought a class action to secure a declaratory judgment that the thirty-minute meal period provided to City of Tempe police officers assigned to traffic or patrol division, from March 14, 1979 to December 31, 1980, constituted work for overtime purposes pursuant to A.R.S. § 23-392(A). The complaint also sought an accounting and an award of damages for overtime pay. The trial court entered judgment for the certified class and against appellant, the City of Tempe (City), holding that the meal period constituted compensable work time. Damages…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Continental Townhouses East Unit One Ass'n v. BrockbankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  2. State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewitArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. McLambCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. Patton v. County of MohaveCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  5. King v. TitsworthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API