Legal Opinion

Lim v. Superior Court in and for Pima County

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 1, 1980No. 2 CA-CIV 3616PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.

Petitioners challenge the respondent court’s refusal to grant their motion for summary judgment and motion for rehearing and reconsideration, alleging that the real party in interest’s claim is barred by the Statute of Limitations. Since petitioners have no plain, speedy and adequate remedy by appeal, and because our granting of relief will terminate this litigation, we assume jurisdiction. Scottsdale Jaycees v. Superior Court of Maricopa County, 17 Ariz.App. 571, 499 P.2d 185 (1972).

On November 21, 1978, the real party in interest Moore filed a complaint against…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scottsdale Jaycees v. SUPERIOR CT. OF MARICOPA CO.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  2. Jackson v. American Credit Bureau, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  3. Staples v. ZophCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Campbell v. Jewish Committee for Personal ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Zimmerer v. General Electric CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1954

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Dube v. LikinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Estate of Chappelle v. SandersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  4. Clark v. Airesearch Manufacturing Co. of Arizona, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. State v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API