Legal Opinion

Staples v. Zoph

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 7, 1935No. Civ. 10461PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCOMB, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendant after the trial court sustained an objection to the introduction of any evidence on the ground that the cause of action alleged in the amended complaint was barred by section 340, subdivision 3, of the Code of Civil Procedure.

The amended complaint attempts to state a cause of action for libel of plaintiff by defendant, the alleged libelous letters having been published on September 15,1932, and 16,1932, respectively; also that defendant had concealed her identity until June 3, 1933. June 3, 1934, was a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kimball v. Pacific Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Gale v. McDanielCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Proctor v. Wells Bros. Co. of New YorkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
  4. Tilden Lumber Co. v. PerinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Bernson v. Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Barnd v. BorstIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Adams v. AlbanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API