Legal Opinion
State v. Superior Court
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 27, 1996No. 1 CA-SA 96-0009PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WEISBERG, Judge.
Petitioners have filed a petition for special action seeking review of the trial court’s denial of their motion to dismiss. They argue that they are immune from suit and that the claims are time-barred. Because petitioners do not have an adequate remedy by appeal on these issues, see City of Phoenix v. Yar-nell, 184 Ariz. 310, 315, 909 P.2d 377, 382 (1995) (immunity); Lim v. Superior Court, 126 Ariz. 481, 482, 616 P.2d 941, 942 (App. 1980) (statute of limitations), we have entered an order accepting jurisdiction over this petition, with a written decision to follow. For…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Buckley v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Supreme Court of Virginia v. Consumers Union of the United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Kenneth O. Ashelman v. Hon. Gary Pope, Judge Division I, Mohave County Superior Court Mohave County Attorney's OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nation v. State, Dept. of CorrectionIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Knapper v. ConnickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- Donahoe v. ArpaioDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2012
- Czechorowski v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Stanley v. GallegosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.