Legal Opinion

Pappas Industrial Parks, Inc. v. Psarros

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 7, 1987PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

For purposes of deciding the appeal, we must assume that Athena and John Psarros made an oral promise to sell to Pappas Industrial Parks, Inc. (“Pappas”), real estate at 57 Fargo Street, South Boston. Pappas argues that, the Statute of Frauds notwithstanding , 2 it is entitled to performance because it reasonably relied to its detriment on the oral promise, and that the Psarroses are estopped to deny that promise. We conclude that the case is one of imperfect negotiations which did not give rise to an enforceable promise, and that judgment was rightly entered for the defendants, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. PMP Associates, Inc. v. Globe Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Levings v. Forbes & Wallace, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  3. Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Loranger Construction Corp. v. E. F. Hauserman Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. Cellucci v. Sun Oil Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary v. QLT Phototherapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  2. Rhode Island Hospital Trust National Bank v. VaradianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. Schwanbeck v. Federal-Mogul Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  4. Madan v. Royal Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  5. Richard J. Trifiro v. New York Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API