Madan v. Royal Indemnity Co.

Anil Madan, the plaintiff, an attorney, filed a complaint in the Superior Court, claiming that the defendant, Royal Indemnity Company, had committed a breach of an agreement to lease certain premises to him. He also claimed, among other things, that the defendant had engaged in an unfair or deceptive act or practice, in violation of G. L. c. 93A, §§ 2(a) and 11. The complaint sought specific performance and damages, both for the breaking of the agreement and for the alleged c. 93A violation. In its answer, the defendant denied that there was any agreement and also pleaded the Statute of…