Legal Opinion

AMERICAN STATE BANK, — v. UNION PLANTERS BANK, N.A., —

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 13, 2003No. 02-3051PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOKEN, Chief Judge.

When one payee indorses a check that is payable jointly to two payees, and a bank pays the indorsing payee without the other’s consent, Article 3 of the Arkansas Uniform Commercial Code provides that the bank is liable for conversion to the non-consenting payee. In this situation, “the measure of liability is presumed to be the amount payable on the instrument.” Aek. Code Ann. § 4-3-420(b) (emphasis added). The appeal in this diversity case raises the difficult question whether the bank’s liability under Arkansas law is limited to the actual harm to the co-payee caused by…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McQuillan v. Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection v. Bank Leumi Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. D & G Equipment Co., Inc. v. The First National Bank of Greencastle, Pa. v. Georgion, Roger L., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  4. Starkey Construction, Inc. v. Elcon, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  5. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Customer Data SEC. Breach Litig. Melissa Alleruzzo v. Supervalu, Inc. (In Re Supervalu, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  2. SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC. v. HarrisonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  3. Cottrell v. AT&T Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
  4. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance v. Michael Baker InternationalDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022
  5. Northeast Bank v. Hanover Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API