Legal Opinion
Cottrell v. AT&T Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 19, 2020No. 3:19-cv-07672Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 DAVID COTTRELL, Case No. 19-cv-07672-JCS 7 Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO 8 v. DISMISS IN PART FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 9 AT&T INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 42 Defendants. 10 11 I. INTRODUCTION 12 Plaintiff David Cottrell alleges that Defendants AT&T Inc., DIRECTV, LLC (“DirecTV”), 13 and Pacific Bell Telephone Co. (collectively, “AT&T”) enrolled him in a subscription service and 14 charged him hundreds of dollars without his consent. AT&T moves under Rule 12(b)(6) of the 15 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.