Legal Opinion
Ashenbrenner v. City of East Grand Forks
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 26, 1960No. 37,830PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas Gallagher, Justice.
Plaintiff as owner of certain property in Polk County near East Grand Forks seeks to enjoin the city of East Grand Forks and its officials from taking any action for the construction of a lagoon-type sewage disposal system on the ground that it would constitute a nuisance, injure her health, and interfere with the enjoyment of her property. Defendants denied this and pursuant to M. S. A. 562.02 moved to require plaintiff to execute and file a surety bond to indemnify the city for any loss it might sustain pending her suit.
On March 17, 1959, the district court granted…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Governmental Research Bureau, Inc. v. BorgenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Tomasko v. CottonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Traeger v. CarletonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Zochrison v. Redemption Gold Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- City of Minneapolis v. Village of Brooklyn CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gram v. Village of ShoreviewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Sisto v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Kilowatt Organization (TKO), Inc. v. Department of Energy, Planning & DevelopmentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Pike v. GunyouSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Anderson v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.