State Ex Rel. Traeger v. Carleton
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Knutson, Justice.
Prior to October 24, 1950, tbe council of tbe village of Hibbing retained the services of Banister Engineering Company of St. Paul (referred to hereinafter as Banister) to make a survey of needed improvements in its sewer system and sewage disposal plant. Banister proceeded to make such survey and estimated that the cost of the proposed improvements would be $742,806.31. On October 24, 1950, the village council adopted a resolution reading as follows:
“Whereas, Chapter 394, Laws of 1949, State of Minnesota, grants additional powers to villages and certain cities to build,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lewis v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- State ex rel. Lum v. ArchibaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Curtis v. St. Paul, Stillwater & Taylor's Falls RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1873
- Tukey v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Harding v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Griswold v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Salt Lake City Corp. v. Jordan River Restoration NetworkUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Busse v. City of GoldenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- O'BYRNE v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Ashenbrenner v. City of East Grand ForksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.