Legal Opinion
Tomasko v. Cotton
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 21, 1937No. 31,334PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
The Marquette National Bank appeals from a judgment entered pursuant to an order granting plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. Defendant Cotton has not appealed. Hereafter we shall refer to appellant as the bank.
The action ivas brought pursuant to the provisions of 2 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 9148, et seq., the so-called unlawful detainer statute. As the court ordered judgment on the pleadings, a sum-marization of the facts pleaded is essential to an understanding of what is here for decision. On and long prior to November 15, 1935, plaintiff was the owner…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Simon v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. SchmidtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. City of NewportSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Pamperin v. ScanlanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gleason v. GearySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Juster Bros. Inc. v. ChristgauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Beliveau v. BeliveauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Radermacher v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Capistrant v. Lifetouch Nat'l Sch. Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.