Pike v. Gunyou
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH, Chief Justice.
We entertained review of a decision of the court of appeals because it became immediately apparent to this court in the exercise of its supervisory authority that the appellate court’s opinion far exceeded the bounds of appropriate appellate re view. 1 We therefore vacate the majority and concurring opinions of the court of appeals, 488 N.W.2d 298, and direct that those opinions shall have neither disposi-tional nor precedential value. Accordingly, we confine our review to scrutiny of the decision of the trial court dismissing the plaintiffs’ action with prejudice for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gram v. Village of ShoreviewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Ashenbrenner v. City of East Grand ForksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Kilowatt Organization (TKO), Inc. v. Department of Energy, Planning & DevelopmentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Pike v. GunyouCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
3Cited by4 opinions
- Anderly v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Anderly v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L.K., ParentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2026
- Pike v. GunyouCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992