Legal Opinion

Turchan v. Bailey Meter Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided May 14, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 1703PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODNEY, District Judge.

This is an action for letters patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 146.1 Technical aspects of the patent application are not here material but some facts must be set out. In the Patent Office an application of the plaintiffs for a particular claim (No. 36) was denied by the Acting Commissioner of Patents whose determination was sustained by the Board of Patent Appeals. In those proceedings in the Patent Office, the plaintiffs were represented by Robert A. Sloman under a power of attorney which must later receive more specific consideration. Under this power of attorney Thomas…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Sanford v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Hill v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Gandy v. MarbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
  2. Radio Corporation of America v. Philco CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Gallogly v. Bakery & Confectionery Workers International UnionDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1960
  4. Brian R. Devlin v. Jerry G. Ingrum and International Integrated Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  5. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Celanese Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API