Legal Opinion

Gallogly v. Bakery & Confectionery Workers International Union

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided January 8, 1960No. Civ. A. No. 2296PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAY, District Judge.

This is an action brought by one hundred and ninety-six persons who are present or former employees of the defendant Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company. As originally filed the complaint also joined the Bakery and Confectionary Workers International Union of America as defendant, but was subsequently dismissed as to that defendant for want of jurisdiction. The other named defendants, James A. Howe and Frank Mykalo, were never served with process. Thus the sole defendant before this Court is the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company (hereinafter called “the Company”).…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Radio Officers' Union of the Commercial Telegraphers Union v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. United Construction Workers v. Laburnum Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. Pittsburgh Gage & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Peay v. MortonDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1983
  3. Kaufman v. ScanlonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1965
  4. Linder v. BergeDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1983
  5. Fullerton v. International Sound Technicians of Motion PictureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API