E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Celanese Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BONSAL, District Judge.
Defendants move for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, dismissing portions of paragraph 16 of plaintiff’s complaint and dismissing the second and third paragraphs of the prayer for relief, which defendants contend seek to raise questions of “patentability, statutory bars and estoppels” in this action brought by plaintiff alleging that it is dissatisfied with a decision of the Board *429of Patent Interferences. 35 U.S.C. § 146.1
Following an interference proceeding in the United States Patent Office and determinations by…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Sanford v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Sperry Rand Corporation, John Presper Eckert, Jr., and John W. Mauchly v. Bell Telephone Laboratories, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Frederick F. Glass v. William C. De RooCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Shell Development Co. v. Pure Oil Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1953
- Edwin J. Vandenberg v. William B. ReynoldsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- Potter Instrument Co. v. Mohawk Data Sciences Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- E. I. duPont de Nemours & Co. v. Celanese Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Wm. T. Burnett & Co. v. General Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1978
- David A Stewart and Terry P StewartUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2021