Legal Opinion
Hardesty v. Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 27, 2011No. C065784PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*408Opinion
HOCH, J.
Joseph and Yvette Hardesty are the owners of Hardesty Sand and Gravel (Hardesty), an open-pit mining operation located near Sloughhouse. The Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (District) obtained from its hearing board an abatement order directing Hardesty to cease operation of the central plant equipment and all internal combustion engines with a rating greater than 50 horsepower until Hardesty obtained a permit from the District. Hardesty then filed a petition for writ of mandate in the trial court, seeking an order directing the District to vacate and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Sail'er Inn, Inc. v. KirbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Alcoa Global Fasteners, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- California Chamber of Commerce v. State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Friends of Outlet Creek v. Mendocino County Air Quality Management DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Alpha Nu Assn. of Theta XI v. University of So. Cal.California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Bachenheimer v. Wells Fargo Bank CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.