Legal Opinion

Schoonover v. Caudill

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1959No. 6484PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SADLER, Justice.

The defendants, husband and wife, who are the appellants in this Court (and the parties will be referred to here as below) seek the review of a money judgment against both of them, in the one instance, and in another, against the husband alone. They were sued upon a complaint describing two separate promissory notes, reading as follows:

“Liberal Kansas, Nov. 8, 1947
“- days after date, I, we, or either of us, promise to pay to the order of The €ít-krena -State Baafej feiberab -Kansas,- M. M. Schoonover, Tucumcari, N.M. at its office in Liberal Kansas, Twenty-Five Hundred Dollars…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Palmer v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Shapleigh Hardware Co. v. SpiroMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Carmichael v. RiceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Gonzales v. Sharp & Fellows Contracting Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Snyder v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Barela v. New Mexico State Board of EducationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Harp v. GourleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Stanbury v. LarsenWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State Ex Rel. Public Service Commission v. First Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Acacia Mutual Life Insurance v. American General Life InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API