Legal Opinion

Carmichael v. Rice

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1945No. 4888PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MABRY, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff-appellant brought suit for $4,500 as the unpaid balance claimed to be due under the terms of a certain promissory note in the original sum of $5,500 for attorney fees and for a judicial declaration that appellant holds a vendor’s lien to the extent of such unpaid balance against certain real property sold to appellee. The facts are not seriously in dispute and the issues presented reduced themselves almost entirely to a question of law, i.e. the legal effect of an acceleration clause in the note in question. It is conceded that if the acceleration clause is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Parker v. MazurCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Curtis v. SpeckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Beckham v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Henderson v. FosterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  5. Stalder v. Riverside Groves Etc. Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MassingillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. Bisno v. SaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. United States v. Agri Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. Foreman v. MyersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Letha Cantrell Guthrie v. Finis CurnuttCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API