Legal Opinion
Harp v. Gourley
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided March 3, 1961No. 6530PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Motion For Rehearing
2Per curiam
Upon consideration of Motion for Rehearing, the original opinion heretofore filed is withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor.
MOISE, Justice.
This is a suit to collect a commission on the sale of a ranch. The right to the commission is based upon a letter from defendant Gourley to the plaintiff, dated August 6, 1945, the material portions of which read as follows:
“Finally, I think we have closed the deal for the 90,000 acres on the lease-purchase basis, however as far as the purchase end is concerned, don’t know when that will take effect owing to Holland has…
3Cases cited28 opinions
- Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Brant v. California Dairies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Michelson v. HouseNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
- United States v. Pan-American Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Tanner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by20 opinions
- Maxwell v. Fidelity Financial Services, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Jernigan v. New Amsterdam Casualty CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Read v. Western Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- Walters Ex Rel. Walters v. HastingsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- Maine v. GarvinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.