Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Nixon v. Blunt

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 3, 2004No. SC 86013PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The request of the Attorney General for a writ of mandamus against the Secretary of State is denied at this time, without prejudice. The Secretary of State has a duty to take all necessary actions to properly submit Senate Joint Resolution 29 to the voters of Missouri at the August 3, 2004, election.

BACKGROUND

On March 1, 2004, the Missouri Senate passed Senate Joint Resolution 29 (SJR 29), proposing to the voters of Missouri a constitutional amendment to add the following provision to article I of the Constitution of the State of Missouri:

Section 33. That to be valid and recognized in this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. Protection Mutual Insurance Co. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  3. State Ex Rel. Upchurch v. BluntSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dotson v. KanderSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  2. Pearson v. KosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  3. Cole v. CarnahanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State ex rel. Teichman v. CarnahanSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  5. Cole v. CarnahanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API