Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Teichman v. Carnahan

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 17, 2012No. SC 92237PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Molly Teichman, as a citizen and qualified voter,1 files a petition for permanent writs of prohibition and mandamus to prevent the Secretary of State from holding an election based on either the first or second senate apportionment plan and map signed and filed by the nonpartisan *603senate reapportionment commission.2 Teichman alleges that the nonpartisan reapportionment commission had no express or implied constitutional authority to file a revised plan and map even though it was concerned that its original plan and map filed with the Secretary of State was constitutionally invalid. Therefore,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Missourians to Protect the Initiative Process v. BluntSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  2. State Ex Rel. Jones v. AtterburySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  3. Preisler v. DohertySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  4. State Ex Rel. Gralike v. WalshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  5. State ex rel. Ohio General Assembly v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. Pearson v. KosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  3. Clara Faatz v. John Ashcroft, Missouri Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2024
  4. Gunn v. Prospects DM, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API