Pearson v. Koster
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Per curiam
Article III, section 45 of the Missouri Constitution establishes when the General Assembly must redistrict Missouri for the election of members to the United States House of Representatives, and that the districts “shall be composed of contiguous territory as compact and nearly equal in population as may be.” Plaintiffs alleged in their petitions that the districts were not drawn “as compact ... as may be,” specifically referring to the redistricting map and the configuration of certain districts. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim or, in the alternative, a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Vieth v. JubelirerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. BandemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Nazeri v. Missouri Valley CollegeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- League of United Latin American Citizens v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pearson v. KosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- In re Senate Joint Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176Supreme Court of Florida · 2012
- Rebecca Clarke v. Wisconsin Elections CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
- Rebecca Clarke v. Wisconsin Elections CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.