Miller v. City of Indianapolis
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Hendricks Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, J.
A controversy arose in this case, in the circuit court, as to whether it was an action to quiet title, or an action to obtain an injunction. Acting upon the theory that it was an action to obtain an injunction, the circuit court refused the request of the appellant for a trial by jury, and also overruled the application of the appellant for a new trial as of right. The complaint in the cause, omitting the caption and the description of the land in controversy, is as follows:
“ Catharine A. Miller, plaintiff, complains of the city of Indianapolis, Leander A. Fulmer and George W. Seibert,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Indianapolis v. KingsburyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Lamar County v. ClementsTexas Supreme Court · 1878
- First National Bank v. RootIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Houck v. GrahamIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- City of Columbus v. DahnIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Richwine v. Presbyterian ChurchIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Fowler v. WoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Wischmeyer v. FinchIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
- Monnett v. TurpieIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Northern Ind. Pub. Serv. Co. v. McCOY ET UX.Indiana Supreme Court · 1959
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.