Legal Opinion

Keimig v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 29, 1988No. 902-83PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

McCORMICK, Judge.

Appellant was charged in a two count information with the offenses of theft over $200.00 and burglary of a building. Appellant entered a plea of guilty to both counts. After a presentence investigation report was prepared for the court, the trial judge assessed punishment at ten years for the theft count and twenty years for the burglary count. On appeal the Fourteenth Court of Appeals found that the offenses were improperly joined in a single indict ment in that the requirements of Article 21.24(a), V.A.C.C.P., were not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fortune v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Holcomb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Keimig v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rosalez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Howell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Saucedo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988
  4. Dumas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Mario Rosalez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API