Rosalez v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANNE GARDNER, Justice.
I. Introduction
Appellant Mario Rosalez appeals his sentence of twelve years’ confinement for sexual assault. In his sole issue, Appellant contends that the trial court erred by overruling his objections to the presentence investigation report. More specifically, Appellant argues that the report contained statements denying him of his Sixth Amendment right to confront and cross-examine witnesses. We affirm.
II. Background
Appellant entered an open plea of guilty to sexually assaulting his estranged wife. In conjunction with his open plea, Appellant executed and filed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Brookhart v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stringer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Stringer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Dajuan Lee Revels v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
- Dajuan Lee Revels v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
- Dajuan Lee Revels v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.