Legal Opinion

Oliver United Filters, Inc. v. Eimco Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 1, 1937No. 1496PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

Oliver United Filters Incorporated brought this suit against the Eimco Corporation and Morris Rosenblatt to enjoin the infringement of patent 1,538,980 and for an accounting. The trial court found defendants’ device did not infringe and entered its decree accordingly. Plaintiff has appealed.

The patent in suit was applied for April 9, 1918, and issued May 26, 1925, to Albert L. Genter. It was duly assigned by Genter to the plaintiff. It is for improvements in continuous vacuum filters.

The claims in suit are set out in subjoined note l.1

*346The device of the patent in suit…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Fay v. CordesmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Jensen-Salsbery Laboratories, Inc. v. O. M. Franklin Blackleg Serum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  4. Wichita Visible Gasoline Pump Co. v. Clear Vision Pump Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  5. Hall-Mammoth Incubator Co. v. TeaboutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mantz v. KerstingDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1939
  2. Band-It Co. v. McAnenyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  3. Elrick Rim Co. v. Reading Tire Machinery Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1957
  4. Interstate Bakeries v. General Baking Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API