Legal Opinion
Fay v. Cordesman
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 3, 1883PublishedCited by 99 opinions
APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR-TEE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP OHIO. Bill in equity for infringement of a patent.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatohford
This suit in equity ivas brought for the infringement of three several letters, patent. The first is reissue No. 1,527, granted to John Richards, August 25th, 1863, for a “ guide and support for scroll-saws,” the original patent, No. 35,390, having been granted to him May 27th, 1862, for an “ improved guide and support for scroll-saws.” The specification of the reissue is as follows, including what is inside of brackets and what is outside of brackets, omitting what is in italic:
“To all ’whom it may concern: Be it known that I, John Richards, of Columbus, in the county of Franklin, and State…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gage v. HerringSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Water-Meter Co. v. DesperSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
3Cited by99 opinions
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Festo Corporation v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., Ltd., A/K/A Smc Corporation, and Smc Pneumatics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- National Hollow Brake-Beam Co. v. Interchangeable Brake-Beam Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Shepard v. CarriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Hubbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.