Elrick Rim Co. v. Reading Tire Machinery Co.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, Chief Judge.
The above-entitled cause heretofore tried, argued and submitted is now decided as follows:
On the issues raised by the plaintiff’s complaint and the defendant’s answer and counter-claim, judgment will be entered as follows:
1. That plaintiff take nothing against the defendants or either of them on either the claim alleging invalidity of the patent in suit or the claim for unfair competition.
2. Judgment will be for the defendant as prayed for in the answer and counter-claim, finding the claims of the patent in suit and each of them valid and infringed by the plaintiff.
Injunc…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- General Electric Co. v. Jewel Incandescent Lamp Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Ansonia Brass & Copper Co. v. Electrical Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Celite Corporation v. Dicalite Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Martin v. Ford Alexander CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
- Van Brode Milling Co. v. Cox Air Gauge System, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1958
- Elrick Rim Co. v. CheekDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1961