Legal Opinion
Dolly, Inc. v. Spalding & Evenflo Companies, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 8, 1994No. 93-1233PublishedCited by 134 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
Dolly, Inc. (Dolly) sued Spalding & Even-flo Companies, Inc. (Evenflo) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Western Division) for unfair competition and infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,854,638 (the ’638 patent). On an earlier appeal in this same case, Dolly, Inc. v. Spalding & Evenflo Cos., 954 F.2d 734, 23 USPQ2d 1555 (Fed.Cir.1992), this court vacated the district court’s preliminary injunction because the trial court had improperly construed the patent claims. On remand, the district court determined that Evenflo infringed the ’638…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Pennwalt Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Becton Dickinson and Company v. C.R. Bard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. David Geoffrey & Associates D/B/A Slazenger, and Dunlop Slazenger Corporation AKA Dunlop Sports CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by134 opinions
- Scimed Life Systems, Inc. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Sage Products, Inc. v. Devon Industries, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Athletic Alternatives, Inc. v. Prince Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- The Regents of the University of California v. Eli Lilly and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Mas-Hamilton Group v. Lagard, Inc., (Now Known as Masco Corporation) and Hi-Shear Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.