Legal Opinion
Krenzer v. Stoffel
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided March 10, 1977No. Patent Appeal No. 9198PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Judge.
This case is before us on a petition by the party Krenzer to “recall, set aside and vacate” our mandate in appeal No. 9198, decided June 27, 1974.1 The basis for the petition is an alleged fraud on this court and on the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Patent Interferences (board) by the respondents Stoffel and Schumacher (Stoffel). Stoffel has requested oral argument. We deny the Krenzer petition; the Stoffel request is thus moot.
Background
To put this petition in perspective, we describe the prior proceedings. Krenzer and Stoffel were parties to an interference (No.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Frederick H. Norton v. Lawrence E. CurtissCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Robert S. Kravig and Arnold E. Johnson v. David J. HendersonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
3Cited by2 opinions
- Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1977
- Transitron Electronic Corp. v. Hughes Aircraft Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1980