Rosa v. CITY OF SEASIDE
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JEREMY FOGEL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Evelyn and Robert Rosa (“Plaintiffs”) brought the instant action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, California Civil Code § 52.1 et seq., and California tort law on behalf of themselves and their deceased son, Michael Rosa. All claims have been dismissed except for Plaintiffs’ tort claims against Defendant TASER International, Inc. (“TASER”). Plaintiffs allege that a TASER-manufactured Electronic Control Device (“ECD”) was a substantial contributing factor in their son’s death and that TASER either is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Brian Barlow v. Officer George Ground, I.D. 9129Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Supreme Court · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Evelyn Rosa v. Taser International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Mariscal v. Graco, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Hollman v. Taser International Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Sanchez v. Boston Scientific Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2014
- Colbath v. Merck & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2022
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.