Evelyn Rosa v. Taser International, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We are called upon to decide whether, in August 2004, a manufacturer of electronic control devices, commonly referred to as “tasers,” was under a duty to warn that repeated exposure to its products could lead to fatal levels of metabolic acidosis.
I
Shortly after 11:00 p.m. on August 29, 2004, a resident of Del Rey Oaks, California, called the police to report that someone who “look[ed] pretty disturbed” was “walking up and down the street yelling ‘Mario’ and ... some other stuff.” Del Rey Oaks Police Officer Russell Van Zanten responded to this noise complaint…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Carlin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Forrest A. Flaminio and Gloria Flaminio v. Honda Motor Company, Ltd., a Japanese CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Conte v. Wyeth, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Mariscal v. Graco, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Kenyock Wright v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Hollman v. Taser International Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Aldaba v. Marshall CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Hawkins v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.