Legal Opinion

Colbath v. Merck & Co., Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 29, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00120Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 MICHAEL COLBATH, Case No.: 3:21-cv-120-W (DEB) 13 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 14 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 15 MERCK & CO., INC., AND MERCK PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT [DOC. SHARP & DOHME CORP., 16 6] Defendants. 17 18 19 Pending before the Court is Defendants Merck & Co., Inc., and Merck Sharp & 20 Dohme Corp.’s (collectively “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Michael 21 Colbath’s Complaint for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 22 12(b)(6).…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API