Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 8, 1985No. 506PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Vincent Cunningham, the insured operator of a motor vehicle, and Deborah Marcus, a passenger, were injured in a one car accident. Alleging that they had been forced off the road by an unknown motorist who did not stop, Cunningham and Marcus submitted uninsured motorist claims to Cunningham’s insurance carrier, Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Prudential). In a complaint filed in assumpsit, the claimants alleged that Prudential had breached the arbitration clause in its policy by failing, upon demand, to appoint an arbitrator. Because Prudential breached its…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. National Grange Mutual Insurance v. KuhnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Consumers Education & Protective Ass'n v. NolanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Board of Education of the School District v. Philadelphia Federation of Teachers Local No. 3Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Klein v. RaysingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Veno v. MeredithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. DeAngelo v. FortneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Acme Markets, Inc. v. Valley View Shopping Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Brooks v. Marriott Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Higgins v. Clearing MacHine Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API