Legal Opinion

Klein v. Raysinger

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 1983No. 44 and 94 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1982PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

McDermott, justice.

This appeal involves the consolidated cases of Klein v. Raysinger, et al.,1 44 Eastern District Appeal Docket 1982; and Myron Klein, Phillip Klein, and Myron Klein, Administrator of the Estate of Klein v. Raysinger et al.,2 94 Eastern District Appeal Docket 1982.

Appellant in No. 44, Michael Klein, filed a personal injury action against Mark Raysinger and others, as a result of an automobile accident. Appellants in No. 94, Myron and Phillip Klein, filed personal injury actions against Mark Raysinger and others (including Michael Klein, as the driver of…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Bernhard v. Harrah's ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Congini by Congini v. PORTERSVILLE ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Coulter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Kelly v. GwinnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Congini by Congini v. PORTERSVILLE ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Fassett v. Delta Kappa EpsilonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  4. Mazzagatti v. Everingham by EveringhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Longstreth v. GenselMichigan Supreme Court · 1985

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API