Legal Opinion

Sicherman v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1946Published

1Opinion of the CourtHallinan, J.

In an action brought to recover disability bene-, fits and for the return of premiums paid, the defendant has challenged the sufficiency of each of the four causes of action asserted by the plaintiff.

*266In pleading causes of action of the character herein involved, it is necessary to allege that the insured, because of his illness, was incapable of engaging in the ordinary forms of employment for compensation or profit, apart from that in which he was engaged prior to the claimed disability. In other words, the ‘ ‘ plaintiff must show his disability was such as to prevent him from engaging in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Garms v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  2. Garms v. Travelers Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Shabotzky v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  4. Becker v. BurkesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  5. Muzio v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API