Legal Opinion
Slater v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 9, 1941No. Civ. No. 11735PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
This is a petition for a writ of mandate to compel respondents, the Superior Court of Contra Costa County and its clerk, to issue execution upon a judgment. If the writ was improperly refused mandamus is the proper remedy to compel its issuance. (Holtum v. Grief, 144 Cal. 521 [78 Pac. 11]; Sullivan v. Superior Court, 185 Cal. 133 [195 Pac. 1061].)
The facts giving rise to this controversy are as follows: Petitioner commenced an action in Contra Costa County against the Shell Oil Company to recover damages to her real property alleged to have been caused by the unauthorized construction of a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Holtum v. GriefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- McCallion v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Sullivan v. Superior Court of Mendocino Cty.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Gloria v. a Colonia PortuguesaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Slater v. Shell Oil CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Folsom v. Butte County Assn. of GovernmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- deSaulles v. Community Hospital of the Monterey PeninsulaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Slater v. Shell Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Folsom v. Butte County Assn. of GovernmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- deSaulles v. Community Hospital of the Monterey PeninsulaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016