Sullivan v. Superior Court of Mendocino Cty.
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandamus to require the issuance and execution of a writ of assistance. Writ granted. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.
This is an application for a writ of mandate and prohibition against the judge of the superior court, county clerk, and sheriff of the county of Mendocino to secure the petitioner in the execution of a writ of assistance to place him in possession of certain real property which he claims under a commissioner’s deed in a sale under foreclosure of mortgage.
All of the facts preliminary to a consideration of petitioner’s rights in the premises are determined by the decree in foreclosure.
This decree was obtained in proceedings duly had giving the court jurisdiction of the persons of the defendants…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Holtum v. GriefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Sichler v. LookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Wiggin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Mayor of San Jose v. FultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Montgomery v. TuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Wyoming Pacific Oil Co. v. PrestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Hennessy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Lámar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- People v. MasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.