Legal Opinion
Ex parte Garrison
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 14, 1924No. 872PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLEDSOE, District Judge.
In 1921 the Legislature of California adopted an act known as the Wright Act, ratified hy referendary vote of the people thereafter, and entitled:
“An act to enforce tie provisions of article eighteen of the amendments to the Constitution of the United States; prohibiting all acts or omissions prohibited by the Volstead Act; imposing duties on courts, prosecuting attorneys, sheriffs and other officers, and extending their jurisdiction; and providing for the disposition of fines and forfeitures.” St. Cal. 1921, p. 79.
Sections 1 and 2 of the Wright Act read as follows:
“Sec…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Eilenbecker v. District Court of Plymouth CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Pierce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Pervear v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Ex Parte KarlsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Ex parte MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kelly v. SchoonfieldDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1968
- United States v. Maria Delia Estrada De CastilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Maria Delia Estrada De CastilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977