United States v. Maria Delia Estrada De Castillo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Concurrence
HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge,
concurring specially (Joined by Judge Ely):
Although I concur with Judge Smith’s Opinion, I concur in that part of the Opinion dealing with committed fines solely under the compulsion of United States v. Dixon (9th Cir. 1976) 538 F.2d 812.
I believe that Dixon is wrong in denying standing to attack the constitutionality of a committed fine imposed on an indigent defendant until he or she has begun or is about to begin service of imprisonment for nonpayment of a committed fine. On the merits, I would hold that the imposition of a committed fine on Mrs. Castillo, an…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tate v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hill v. United States Ex Rel. WamplerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.