Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Maria Delia Estrada De Castillo

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 15, 1977No. 75-2914Published

1Concurrence

HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge,

concurring specially (Joined by Judge Ely):

Although I concur with Judge Smith’s Opinion, I concur in that part of the Opinion dealing with committed fines solely under the compulsion of United States v. Dixon (9th Cir. 1976) 538 F.2d 812.

I believe that Dixon is wrong in denying standing to attack the constitutionality of a committed fine imposed on an indigent defendant until he or she has begun or is about to begin service of imprisonment for nonpayment of a committed fine. On the merits, I would hold that the imposition of a committed fine on Mrs. Castillo, an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Tate v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Hill v. United States Ex Rel. WamplerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API