Legal Opinion
McKinley v. Bethel
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 29, 1985No. 2 CA-CIV 5105PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LACAGNINA, Judge.
This case involves the application of Rule 15(c), Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S., and its function of relating back an amended complaint filed after the running of the statute of limitations to the date of the filing of the original complaint. It also involves the application of Rule 6(f), Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S., regarding the service of a summons and complaint within one year after filing of the complaint.
The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Lester Peck Bethel and Floyd Bethel dismissing Georgia and Fred *73McKinley’s complaint.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Servatius v. United Resort Hotels, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1969
- Murphey v. ValenzuelaArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Grobe v. McBrydeArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Hughes Air Corp. v. Maricopa County Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- O'HARE v. GriesmerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ritchie v. Grand Canyon Scenic RidesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Siemion v. RumfeltAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Canteen Corp. v. SUP. COURT IN & FOR PIMA CTY.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- Bisaillon v. CasaresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- McKinley v. BethelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.