Legal Opinion

Canteen Corp. v. SUP. COURT IN & FOR PIMA CTY.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 24, 1988No. 2 CA-SA 88-0048PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner brought this special action from the trial court’s denial of its motion to dismiss the real party in interest’s complaint on the ground that the statute of limitations had run. Special action review is particularly appropriate where the issue of the statute of limitations has been raised and, where that claim is denied incorrectly, there is no plain, speedy or adequate remedy by appeal. Lim v. Superior Court in and for County of Pima, 126 Ariz. 481, 616 P.2d 941 (App.1980).

The litigation centers around an automobile accident which occurred on April…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sato v. Van DenburghArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Lim v. Superior Court in and for Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  3. Hughes Air Corp. v. Maricopa County Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  4. McKinley v. BethelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ritchie v. Grand Canyon Scenic RidesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Services Holding Co. v. Transamerica Occidental Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  3. Bisaillon v. CasaresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  4. Ritchie v. Grand Canyon Scenic RidesArizona Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API