Legal Opinion

Gervis v. Knapp

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1943PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchreiber, J.

The action is for damages for breach of contract. The parties to that contract are plaintiff, a theatrical manager, and defendants, respectively an infant singer and her mother, who guaranteed the contract. The infant has dis-affirmed the contract and summary judgment has been granted herein in her favor. The mother now, likewise, moves for summary judgment, asserting that disaffirmance by the infant principal, in the circumstances at bar, relieves her of any liability as guarantor as a matter of law.

Generally, and contrary to the usual rule in principal and surety, a guarantor for a minor…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seeley v. Seeley-Howe-Le Van Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Goldfinger v. DohertyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934
  3. Pawlowski v. WoodruffAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1924
  4. Lagerquist v. Bankers Bond & Mortgage Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  5. Parker v. BakerNew York Court of Chancery · 1839

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mandel v. LiebmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Shelton v. Elite Model Management, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In Re the Arbitration Between Prinze & JonasNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. In Re the Arbitration Between Prinze & JonasNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API